Uses

  • Occupational, counseling and clinical psychologists may choose the MAT for assessment of special populations, especially the blind and visually impaired.

  • Occupational psychologists may use the test to select persons for quickness, fluency, creativity, and empathic understanding.

  • Counseling psychologists may employ the MAT to gauge narrative abilities and creativity for vocational decisions.

  • Child clinical psychologists may use the test with children and adolescents for evaluation of attention, impulsivity, executive control, and fantasy.

  • Clinical psychologists may use the instrument as part of a comprehensive psychological evaluation when convergent validity of findings is useful or important.

  • Psychodynamic psychotherapists may employ the instrument to elicit client’s “frameworks of meaning”, psychodynamics, dispositional mood, emotional blockages, and defenses.

  • Clinical psychologists may use the MAT for diagnostic assessment of alexethymia and autistic spectrum disorders.

  • Neuropsychologists may employ the test to evaluate cross-modal transfer and speed of adaptation.

  • Forensic examiners may use the test as a check on dissimulation from tests that may be easily faked.

  • Clinical and counseling psychologists may use the test to identify narrative style and tailor interventions to how the respondent gives meaning to the stimuli.

  • Clinical and counseling psychologists may use the MAT with persons from diverse environmental and cultural backgrounds because pictorial images are eliminated. Respondents create their own characters, plots, and settings.

  • Psychologists may use the test to evaluate spontaneity and observe how the respondent imposes meaning upon emotionally laden ambiguous stimuli.

When the MAT is added to standard self-report tests, examiners have increased confidence in assessment results. The MAT provides a complementary form of evaluation to paper-and-pencil testing. Respondents are free to structure responses in a wide variety of ways while the challenging task provides the examiner an opportunity to observe and compare respondents’ affective behavior and coping strategies in a standardized setting .